SDG16: Part 2 — Enforcing Digital Identity (unlimitedhangout.com)


Listen to the podcast

Overview & Context 📘

In October 3, 2023, journalists Iain Davis and Whitney Webb published Part 2 of their SDG16 investigative series on Unlimited Hangout, offering a critical systems-based analysis of how Sustainable Development Goal 16.9—digital identity—functions as a tool for global governance consolidation and authoritarian infrastructure expansion.

📌 Central Thesis

  • SDG16’s stated aim—providing universal legal identity—masks covert ambitions: strengthening the UN-led global regime through surveillance and centralized identity tracking.
  • The authors argue digital IDs are foundational to a gov-corp technate, enabling cross-system integration and individual monitoring.

🔍 Key Insights

  • Digital identity isn’t just a neutral utility—it’s a mechanism for citizen data capture, control, and standardization at scale.
  • Such systems facilitate borderless governance, tying individuals into a global data architecture beyond democratic control.
  • Positioned as the next step after police-state infrastructure (covered in SDG16 Pt 1), digital ID is the keystone for techno-authoritarian rule.

🌐 Broader Significance

  • The piece exposes how UN targets can hide power centralization agendas, especially when governments and corporations entwine.
  • Serves as a warning: Without democratic pushback, digital ID ecosystems could entrench surveillance societies across nations.
  • Adds ideological context to concerns about privacy, sovereignty, algorithmic governance, and institutional accountability.

📚 Citation

Davis, I. & Webb, W. (2023, October 3). SDG16: Part 2 — Enforcing Digital Identity. Unlimited Hangout. Retrieved from https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/10/investigative-reports/sdg16-part-2-enforcing-digital-identity/
Overview generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4).

Read more ⟶

SDG16: Part 1 — Building the Global Police State (unlimitedhangout.com)


Listen to the podcast

Overview & Context 📘

In June 2023, journalists Iain Davis and Whitney Webb released Part 1 of the SDG16 investigative series, titled “Building the Global Police State,” on Unlimited Hangout. The article critically examines how United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16, ostensibly about peace, justice, and strong institutions, is being leveraged to construct a global governance regime through policing and surveillance infrastructure.

🧩 Central Argument

  • Though SDG16 promotes “peaceful and inclusive societies,” the authors argue it’s being used to expand centralized power, entrenching global institutional authority under the guise of security :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}.
  • The UN and allied bodies are accelerating “police state” measures—surveillance, data collection, and enforcement mechanisms—without adequate democratic oversight.

🔍 Key Exposés

  • Highlights the instrumentalization of real or imagined threats to justify authoritarian measures.
  • Details how UN frameworks and partnerships are normalizing surveillance systems and global policing trends.
  • Links SDG16’s design to broader gov‑corp technate strategies, where public-private coordination enables centralized control.

📚 Citation

Davis, I. & Webb, W. (2023, June 5). SDG16: Part 1 — Building the Global Police State. Unlimited Hangout. Retrieved from https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/06/investigative-series/sdg16-part-1-building-the-global-police-state/
Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4).

Read more ⟶

The Powell Memo, the Supreme Court, and the ruling-class counteroffensive (liberationschool.org)


🧠 Overview & Context

In this July 2023 article for Liberation School, Jaan Laaman examines the Powell Memorandum as a foundational text in the U.S. ruling class’s ideological and institutional counteroffensive against the gains of the 1960s–70s liberation movements. The piece argues that the Supreme Court has become a central vehicle for this project.

⚖️ Powell Memo as a Ruling-Class Blueprint

  • The 1971 Lewis Powell Memo, authored for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, warned of a perceived crisis of capitalism and urged a broad-based strategy to reassert corporate and conservative dominance.
  • The memo helped galvanize efforts to build a network of right-wing think tanks, legal organizations (like the Federalist Society), and media outlets.

🏛️ Supreme Court as a Weapon

  • The article argues that the Supreme Court has been intentionally transformed into a reactionary instrument for corporate and elite interests.
  • Recent rulings—especially those overturning Roe v. Wade and gutting labor protections—are presented as expressions of a long-term counterrevolution rooted in Powell’s vision.

🧩 The Broader Strategy

  • Laaman emphasizes how this counteroffensive extends beyond the judiciary: it includes education, media, politics, and finance.
  • The intent is to lock in minority rule, protect wealth, and suppress working-class power, especially among Black, Brown, and Indigenous communities.

📣 Call to Action

  • The piece concludes by calling for mass organization, ideological clarity, and militant activism to resist the counterrevolution and reclaim the democratic gains of prior movements.

“The Powell Memo was nothing less than a call to arms by the ruling class.” — Jaan Laaman

Read more ⟶

What’s Wrong with Technocracy? (bostonreview.net)


Overview & Context 🔎

In this August 22, 2022 essay for Boston Review, political scientist Matthew Cole critiques technocracy—government by experts—arguing it poses deep threats to democracy due to concentrated power and flawed notions of expertise.

🧩 Core Arguments

  • Unjust Power Concentration
    Expert rule can sideline citizens and centralize decision-making in unaccountable elites. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

  • Flawed Theory of Knowledge
    Experts might be ill-equipped to resolve the full spectrum of public concerns, especially value-laden and procedural questions outside technical domains.

Read more ⟶

Narya and Peter Thiel Lead Investment in Rumble


Overview & Context

In May 2021, Rumble—a video platform popular with conservative and independent creators—announced a funding round led by Narya Capital (co-founded by J.D. Vance), Peter Thiel, and Colt Ventures. The investment supports expansion of Rumble’s cloud services and video infrastructure.

🔑 Why This Matters

  • Creator empowerment: Rumble positions itself as a “free speech” alternative to mainstream platforms, enabling smaller creators to monetize their content.
  • Rapid growth: Monthly active users jumped from ~1.6 M to 31 M in just a year—a surge supported by conservative creator migration.
  • Strategic backing: The involvement of Narya Capital reinforces the ties between MAGA-aligned venture actors and tech platforms aimed at political influence.

🧭 Broader Significance

  • Signals a shift toward alt‑tech ecosystems, where funding from political and ideological networks supports platforms less constrained by mainstream moderation.
  • Reflects the deepening interconnections between right-aligned tech investors and media infrastructure—part of a larger gov‑corp technate narrative.

📚 Citation

Rumble Corporate Blog. (2021, May 19). Narya and Peter Thiel Lead Investment in Rumble. Retrieved from https://corp.rumble.com/blog/narya-and-peter-thiel-lead-investment-in-rumble/
Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4).

Read more ⟶

Freedom in the World 2018 – Democracy in Crisis (freedomhouse.org)


🧠 Overview & Context

In Freedom in the World 2018: Democracy in Crisis, Freedom House delivers a sobering assessment of the 12th consecutive year of democratic decline across the globe. The report tracks the erosion of political rights and civil liberties worldwide, with a particular focus on the rise of authoritarian power and the retreat of democratic norms in established democracies.

📉 Key Findings

  • 71 countries experienced net declines in political rights and civil liberties, while only 35 improved.
  • The report warns of an accelerating trend of autocrats undermining opposition, silencing dissent, and rigging electoral systems.
  • Democracies like the United States and India showed signs of regression, raising alarm over the strength of the democratic model.
  • Russia and China were seen as emboldened authoritarian models, exerting growing influence abroad.
  • In Europe, populist leaders in countries like Hungary and Poland actively dismantled institutional checks on executive power.
  • Press freedom came under attack globally, including in countries traditionally seen as free.

🇺🇸 Democracy in the U.S.

  • The report expressed concern over President Trump’s attacks on the media, judiciary, and electoral legitimacy.
  • It highlighted institutional resilience in the U.S. but warned that democratic norms were under stress.

⚠️ Democratic Recession

  • The report frames the moment as a global democratic recession, with liberal values no longer spreading as they once did.
  • It calls for renewed leadership and engagement from democratic governments and civil society to defend open societies.

“Democracy is facing its most serious crisis in decades.” — Freedom House

Read more ⟶

Obama‑linked activists have a training manual for protesting Trump (nypost.com)


🧭 Overview & Context

This 2017 New York Post article highlights an early guide for protesting the Trump administration, co-authored by activists with ties to Organizing for Action (OFA)—a community organizing group that evolved from President Obama’s movement.

The piece reveals how this so-called “training manual,” published in partnership with the Indivisible Project, provides strategic advice for effective citizen action:

  • 🔇 Maintain silence and discretion: Protesters are advised to stay quiet and inconspicuous during meetings or public forums.
  • 🪑 Strategic seating: It suggests finding seats close to speakers to improve visibility and influence.
  • 🤝 Localized organization: Encourages activists to build grassroots networks within congressional districts.

These tactics underscore the broader Indivisible movement’s approach: combining peaceful civil resistance with targeted, organized action to hold elected officials accountable.

Read more ⟶

Geeks for Monarchy: The Rise of the Neoreactionaries (techcrunch.com)


Overview & Context 🧠

In this November 22, 2013 article for TechCrunch, Klint Finley profiles the then-nascent neoreactionary movement (aka the Dark Enlightenment), spotlighting tech-geek intellectuals who advocate for a return to monarchy, hierarchy, and anti-democratic governance.

🔍 Key Insights

  • Argues neoreactionaries combine Silicon Valley futurism with pre-revolutionary political ideals, voicing distaste for democracy and egalitarian norms.
  • Identifies Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug) as the movement’s originator, with followers like Nick Land and Michael Anissimov drawn from tech-savvy communities like Hacker News and Less Wrong.
  • Highlights early political echoes in figures such as Peter Thiel and Pax Dickinson, indicating the movement’s broader ideological reach in tech circles.

⚠️ Why It Matters

  • Marks one of the first mainstream tech-press reports on neoreactionary ideology, showing how fringe political philosophies infiltrated geek culture.
  • Helps explain later trends: the binding of tech innovation, cryptocurrency libertarianism, and authoritarian political models—especially surrounding figureheads like Thiel and Yarvin.
  • Serves as a foundational snapshot of how Dark Enlightenment ideas migrated from obscure blogs into mainstream tech and political discourse.

📚 Citation

Finley, K. (2013, November 22). Geeks for Monarchy: The Rise of the Neoreactionaries. TechCrunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2013/11/22/geeks-for-monarchy/
Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4).

Read more ⟶

Universalism: Postwar Progressivism as a Christian Sect (unqualified-reservations.org)


Overview & Context

In this July 2007 post, Unqualified Reservations offers a reflective critique on post–World War II progressivism, exploring how universalist values shaped American liberal thought and culture in the late 20th century—while also highlighting tensions and contradictions that emerged over time.

🧠 Core Themes

  • Traces the rise of universalist ideals—equality, inclusion, rights—as central to postwar progressive policy and identity.
  • Explores the political and cultural trade-offs, considering how universalism both united and fractured coalitions across race, class, and ideology.
  • Examines the limits of liberal universalism, including pushback from identity-based movements and global political shifts.

⚖️ Why It Matters

  • Provides historical context for understanding current progressive and liberal debates—from multiculturalism to economic inequality.
  • Highlights unresolved tensions between universal principles and particular identities, which continue to shape democratic politics today.
  • Serves as a thoughtful piece for those studying the evolution of American political culture in the early 21st century.

📚 Citation

Unqualified Reservations. (2007, July). Universalism: Postwar Progressivism as …. Retrieved from https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2007/07/universalism-postwar-progressivism-as/
Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4).

Read more ⟶

Analytical Activism: A New Approach to Solving the Sustainability Problem


💡 Overview & Context

Analytical Activism (2006) by Jack Harich, published by Thwink.org, challenges traditional “classic” activism by advocating a systematic, analysis-first approach to complex sustainability problems.

🔍 Key Concepts

  • Classic Activism relies on intuition and trial-and-error to tackle issues, often hitting only low-leverage problems.
  • Analytical Activism applies scientific methods, including modeling and experimentation, aiming at high-leverage points to drive systemic change.

📎 Citation

Harich, J. (2006, September 26). Analytical Activism: A New Approach to Solving the Sustainability Problem. Thwink.org. Retrieved from https://www.thwink.org/sustain/publications/books/01_AnalyticalActivism/AnalyticalActivism.pdf
Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4).

Read more ⟶