ICE Is Using a New Facial Recognition App to Identify People, Leaked Emails Show (404media.co)
New evidence from internal ICE emails reveals the development of Mobile Fortify, a smartphone app for agents to run facial recognition and fingerprint scans using camera phones—tapping into CBP’s Traveler Verification System, which logs biometric data at U.S. borders.
Key risks highlighted:
- The tool can identify individuals in-field without court oversight, increasing the risk of false matches and wrongful arrests, according to the ACLU.
- The mass deployment of such biometric tech by ICE lacks congressional authorization and raises privacy and civil liberties concerns.
Civil liberties reaction:
…
Impeaching Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. (docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20250623/Al%20Green%20Impeachment%206.24.pdf)
Indivisible (indivisible.org)
Virtual training and calls
Blue State Defiance - no secret police
INDIVISIBLE: A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO DEMOCRACY ON THE BRINK
Overview & Context
🌍 Indivisible is a nationwide grassroots movement founded in 2016 by former congressional staffers aiming to defend democracy through local action and civic engagement. It provides practical tools and guidance for community members to effectively advocate for progressive causes at the legislative level.
🔧 Core Activities
- Offers step-by-step guides for contacting (and influencing) elected officials.
- Organizes local chapters and coordinates town halls, actions, and campaigns.
- Tracks and mobilizes against anti-democratic policies, including threats to electoral integrity, voting rights, and democratic norms.
🧭 Strategic Focus
- Emphasizes nonpartisan legislative intervention, encouraging citizens to hold all elected officials accountable.
- Supports coalition-building, issue advocacy, and rapid response to emerging threats to democracy.
- Known for its “Indivisible Guide”, inspired by the Tea Party playbook but used to defend—and strengthen—democratic institutions.
Citation
Indivisible Team. (2016, January 16). Indivisible. Retrieved from https://indivisible.org/
…
Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4).
Introduction to Technocracy (archive.org)
Overview & Context 📘
This 1940 volume, published by Technocracy Incorporated, presents one of the clearest and most accessible introductions to the technocratic movement—a proposal to replace market-driven democracy with scientific governance administered by engineers and scientists. (archive.org)
🔍 Core Principles
- Energy Certificate System: Advocates for an economy managed through energy-based credits instead of currency, reflecting actual resource use and production metrics.
- Technocratic Governance (“Technate”): Envisions a centralized authority staffed by technical experts overseeing production, infrastructure, and distribution.
- Quantitative Planning: Emphasizes data, systems analysis, and continuous measurement to optimize societal functions and eliminate inefficiencies.
- Beyond Politics: Argues democracy and partisan politics are obsolete, distracting from the scientific management of society and resources.
🌐 Historical & Ideological Relevance
- Captures a moment in mid-20th-century reformist thought, which believed that science could reshape society beyond political institutions.
- Precedes modern discussions around algorithmic governance, data-driven policy, and critiques of market capitalism.
- Serves as a foundational text for understanding gov‑corp technate ideas—where state functions, corporate logic, and surveillance converge in expert-led systems.
📚 Citation
Technocracy Incorporated. (1940). Introduction to Technocracy. Retrieved from Archive.org. Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4).
…
It Is a Coup (broligarchy.substack.com)
⚠️ Overview & Context
In this July 2, 2025 piece from the Broligarchy Substack, a member of the 50501 movement declares unequivocally: “It is a coup.” The article warns that the United States is no longer operating under democratic rule, arguing that the actions of Donald Trump, his allies, and a complicit Supreme Court have culminated in an active authoritarian takeover.
🏛️ The Moment of No Return
- The Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. United States granting absolute presidential immunity is framed as the final blow to constitutional governance.
- With this decision, Trump now operates with unchecked power—free to violate laws, issue authoritarian edicts, and ignore court orders.
- This moment is described not as the start of a coup, but the confirmation that one has already succeeded.
🕳️ Descent into Authoritarianism
- The piece outlines the deliberate dismantling of democratic norms:
- Mass firings of federal employees
- The weaponization of agencies like ICE and DOJ
- Criminalization of dissent
- Censorship and data suppression across tech platforms
- It connects these moves to Project 2025, suggesting it is being implemented in real-time, not merely proposed.
🚨 Call to Action
- The author implores Americans to stop treating this as politics-as-usual.
- They urge readers to:
- Join protests
- Disengage from Big Tech platforms
- Organize locally
- Pressure institutions to resist
“If we keep pretending this is still a democracy, we will lose everything. It is already gone.”
…
It's Even Worse Than You Think, But There's Hope: Pulling back the curtain on the dark motivations behind the Trump regime's chaos, and what you can do to stop it (50501.substack.com)
🌍 Overview & Context
📅 Published: May 27, 2025 • 📍 Source: Substack by 50501 NY
This manifesto pulls back the curtain on what the authors call the coordinated hostile takeover led by the Trump administration, Elon Musk, and tech elites, supported by Russia, aiming to dismantle democracy and install an autocratic technocratic regime.
🧩 Core Diagnoses
- Big Tech & Neoreactionaries: Influenced by Curtis Yarvin’s “Dark Enlightenment”, figures like Peter Thiel, Musk, Marc Andreessen, and J.D. Vance pursue authoritarian “network‑states” powered by AI, crypto, and technocracy.
- Republican Party Alignment: Through groups like the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025, they push for mass firings, executive overreach, and establishment of “Freedom Cities” on federal land.
- Russian Influence: Putin-backed authoritarian disruption complements the domestic authoritarian push—undermining global democracy and aligning Trump with Putin’s agenda.
🚨 Immediate Threats
- Civil liberties under assault: Targeted repression of immigrants, LGBTQ+ people, federal employees, academics, and protestors.
- Media capture: Legacy outlets like Fox and platforms like X and Facebook act as propaganda arms; AI‑generated content drowns out dissent.
- Economic instability: Tariffs, executive firings, and social‑program defunding fuel recession, while tech oligarchs hedge bets with crypto.
✊ The People’s Resistance
- Grassroots expansion: Leaderless groups like 50501, Tesla Takedown, and General Strike mobilize actions and boycotts.
- Local empowerment: Surge in organizing by groups like Indivisible, mutual‑aid, buying local campaigns, and runs-for-office by ordinary citizens.
- Institutional pushback: Law‑firm letters, Harvard’s legal defenses, AOC & Sanders “Fight Oligarchy” tour, and civic dissent from civil‑rights groups.
🔑 Why It Matters
- The piece frames authoritarianism as a “coordinated technate” rather than random actions—rooted in ideology and institutional planning.
- Emphasizes that obedience is optional, not inevitable—urging decentralized resistance by individuals, communities, and networks.
- Sparks a roadmap for everyday civic action: calling reps, organizing locally, supporting independent media, boycotting Big Tech, and attending protests.
✨ How You Can Use This Markdown
Copy and paste this entire block directly into your Visual Studio Code editor where you’d like the blog post—front matter first, then the overview, so it displays correctly in Hugo.
…It’s Even Worse Than You Think (ny50501.substack.com)
📚 Overview & Context
This post from 50501 NY, titled “It’s Even Worse Than You Think”, offers a sweeping indictment of the Trump-Musk regime, arguing it represents a coordinated authoritarian movement fueled by Big Tech, Project 2025, and foreign influence (notably Russia).
The essay serves as both a diagnosis of systemic democratic breakdown and a mobilization tool for a decentralized movement of protest and resistance.
…JD Vance attacks Newsom and LA mayor while misnaming senator arrested by the FBI (theguardian.com)
Overview & Context
📅 Published: June 20, 2025 • 📍 Source: The Guardian
Vice President J.D. Vance traveled to Los Angeles to defend federal immigration raids and sharply criticize California Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, accusing them of encouraging violent protests in response to ICE operations.
🔥 Key Points
- Vance claimed that Democratic leaders had “basically said this is open season on federal law enforcement,” blaming them for creating “hostility toward federal agents.”
- He visited a federal operations center, met with troops, and warned that “insurrectionist” protests would not be tolerated.{index=2}
- Vance also misnamed Senator Alex Padilla as “Jose Padilla,” referencing a convicted terrorist, which drew widespread condemnation.
🧭 Broader Significance
- The remarks signal a federal escalation of enforcement efforts and deepen the divide between state sanctuary policies and the Trump administration’s stance.
- National Guard and military forces have been deployed to quell protests, raising questions about federalism and militarized responses to civil unrest.
- Vance’s public rebuke of local leaders reflects the administration’s strategy to frame immigration enforcement as a political and cultural battleground, not just a policy issue.
Citation
Mackey, R. & Agencies. (2025, June 20). JD Vance attacks Newsom & Bass over LA ICE protests. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/20/jd-vance-los-angeles-ice-protests
…
OpenAI. (2025). Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4). Retrieved from chat.openai.com
Jeffrey Epstein Showed Pics of Trump with Topless Young Women, Claims Michael Wolff (thedailybeast.com)
🔎 Overview & Context
In a chilling revelation on his Fire & Fury podcast, journalist Michael Wolff alleges that Jeffrey Epstein possessed Polaroid photos of Donald Trump with “topless young women,” some reportedly seated on Trump’s lap—taken in the late 1990s at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence.
📸 Key Allegations
- Wolff claims Epstein stored “about half a dozen” such photos in his safe.
- The FBI reportedly seized them during its 2019 raid of Epstein’s properties.
- Descriptions included one image where “there’s a stain… on the front of Trump’s pants, and the girls are pointing at him and laughing”.
🛡️ Responses & Repercussions
- Trump’s campaign swiftly dismissed Wolff as a “disgraced writer” peddling fiction for sales.
- Some experts suggest the FBI’s continued bowing of these photos may indicate a high level of concern over their content.
- The episode intensifies scrutiny of Trump’s historical ties with Epstein and the lingering puzzle of undisclosed evidence in federal investigations.
(Summary generated by ChatGPT, GPT‑4‑turbo, July 2025)
…
Judge in 2024 Election Results Lawsuit Sets Timeline (newsweek.com)
Overview & Context
A judge in Rockland County, New York has set a timeline for the 2024 election results lawsuit initiated by SMART Legislation, a watchdog arm of SMART Elections. The lawsuit, centered on alleged voting discrepancies, will now proceed through a structured discovery phase.
- Discovery allowed: The court has authorized the exchange of documents like ballots, voting machine records, and poll logs for further examination.
- Scheduled hearing: A hearing to address the next steps has been scheduled (specific date not detailed in the article).
- Scope of allegations: SMART’s complaint includes claims about anomalous voting patterns—such as cases with votes cast for a Senate candidate but not the presidential ticket—which SMART Elections asserts merit a closer audit.
Significance
- The judge’s decision transforms the case from preliminary challenge to active examination, increasing transparency and demands for clarity around the voting process.
- While unlikely to overturn certified results, prompting disclosure could build public trust in the electoral system amid ongoing scrutiny of election integrity.
Citation
Newsweek. (2025, June 15). Judge in 2024 election results lawsuit sets timeline. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/judge-2024-election-lawsuit-timeline-2084468/
…