Amy Coney Barrett warned about Trump’s tyranny and now she’s helping enable it: expert

Overview & Context

📜 This Raw Story article by Matthew Chapman highlights criticism of Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s recent rulings from legal scholars and experts who argue she is aiding the erosion of democratic norms—despite previously expressing concern over executive overreach.

🧩 Key Points

• Barrett, who once warned about the dangers of authoritarianism and unchecked presidential power, is now seen as playing a pivotal role in empowering Trump’s legal agenda through key Supreme Court decisions.
• Legal experts accuse her of hypocrisy, noting that her rulings contradict earlier scholarly writings where she emphasized the need for judicial independence and restraint.
• The Court’s increasing alignment with Trump’s interests, especially on issues related to executive authority, has prompted concern about the judiciary’s role in legitimizing tyranny.

🔍 Expert Reactions

• Legal analysts argue that Barrett has moved far from her originalist judicial philosophy, now issuing decisions that favor centralized executive power.
• There is growing alarm about the Supreme Court’s partisan tilt, particularly with Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch consistently siding with Trump-friendly outcomes.

🧱 Structural Threats

• Critics suggest these trends represent a judicial backslide, weakening democratic checks and balances and paving the way for authoritarian governance.
• The article underscores the broader theme of “court capture” and the role of the judiciary in consolidating illiberal rule.

Citation

Chapman, M. (2025, July 1). Amy Coney Barrett warned about Trump’s tyranny and now she’s helping enable it: expert. Raw Story. Retrieved from https://www.rawstory.com/coney-barrett-trump-tyranny/
OpenAI. (2025). Summary generated by ChatGPT (GPT‑4). Retrieved from chat.openai.com